Players at the world energy market: US National Laboratories
U.S Department of Energy Secretary Steven
Among the new approved projects are:
Several initiatives to advance civilian supercomputing, in which DOE national laboratories now hold the global lead;
New equipment for the DOE Bioenergy Research Centers, the world’s most advanced centers for fundamental research on biofuels;
New equipment for DOE Joint Genome Institute, the world’s largest genomic sequencing facility for non-medical, DOE mission-related research in bioenergy, climate, and environmental remediation;
Improvements at high-intensity light sources--today’s cutting edge tools for advanced research in energy, materials science, and a host of other fields;
Facilities upgrades and new equipment at several national laboratories and universities for fusion energy research;
Expanded funding for integrated climate research, which blends climate modeling with modeling of human factors such as economics and choices about energy production, consumption, and use;
Analysis of Smart Grid technology development, to improve the efficiencies of the nation’s electricity grid.
$107.5 million is slated to go to universities, nonprofit organizations, and private firms, generally on a competitive, peer-reviewed basis. The remaining $220 million will go to U.S. Department of Energy National Laboratories for a range of research, instrumentation, and infrastructure projects, including $164.7 million for projects already allocated as follows:
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory;
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; Berkeley, CA—$ 37.8 million, including $13.1 million to upgrade equipment at the DOE Joint Genome Institute; $11 million for fusion energy research; $8.8 million for equipment improvements at the Advanced Light Source; $4 million for new instrumentation at the DOE Joint BioEnergy Institute, one of three DOE Bioenergy Research Centers; and $875,000 for mathematical analysis related to the development of Smart Grid technology.
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory; Stanford, CA—$21.8 million, including $20 million for an experimental end station at the Linac Coherent Light Source to study high energy density plasmas; and $1.8 million for improvements at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource.
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory; Princeton, NJ—$13.8 million, including $8.8 million for a variety of initiatives in fusion energy research and $5 million for infrastructure improvements at the laboratory.
Brookhaven National Laboratory; Upton, NY—$9.5 million, including $3 million for improvements at the National Synchrotron Light Source; and $6.5 million for neutrino research.
Oak Ridge National Laboratory; Oak Ridge, TN—$8.7 million, including $5.4 million for equipment at the DOE BioEnergy Science Center, a DOE Bioenergy Research Center; $3.2 million to seed development of computerized knowledgebase to integrate masses of data flowing from DOE-supported genomics and systems biology research; and $180,000 for fusion energy research.
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; Richland, WA—$5.7 million, including $4.9 million for integrated assessment modeling for climate; and $867,000 for mathematical analysis related to the development of Smart Grid.
Argonne National Laboratory; Argonne, IL—$5.6 million for improvements at the Advanced Photon Source.
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory; Livermore, CA—$810,000 for fusion energy research.
Sandia National Laboratories; Sandia, NM, and Sandia, CA—$800,000, including $688,000 for mathematical analysis related to the development of Smart Grid; and $75,000 for fusion energy research.
In March Secretary Chu announced $1.2 billion in DOE Office of Science Recovery Act projects. In July, DOE announced a new Office of Science Early Career Research Program to be funded with $85 million in Recovery Act funds. With this third and final round of projects, the Obama Administration has now approved projects covering the full $1.6 billion that the DOE Office of Science received from Congress under the Recovery Act.
Vasil Sidorov on September
From DOE Office of Science
Comments
-
No comments